<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for random bytes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pekdon.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pekdon.net</link>
	<description>Ramblings from a northern geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 08:43:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interpreting RFCs by pekdon</title>
		<link>http://pekdon.net/2010/04/21/interpreting-rfcs/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>pekdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 08:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pekdon.net/?p=174#comment-144</guid>
		<description>From RFC2119:

4. SHOULD NOT   This phrase, or the phrase &quot;NOT RECOMMENDED&quot; mean that
   there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances when the
   particular behavior is acceptable or even useful, but the full
   implications should be understood and the case carefully weighed
   before implementing any behavior described with this label.

Given that description you can indeed ignore it, if you know what you&#039;re doing. Anyway, in my case I have to support whatever is out there already and thus SHOULDs can not really be ignore by me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From RFC2119:</p>
<p>4. SHOULD NOT   This phrase, or the phrase &#8220;NOT RECOMMENDED&#8221; mean that<br />
   there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances when the<br />
   particular behavior is acceptable or even useful, but the full<br />
   implications should be understood and the case carefully weighed<br />
   before implementing any behavior described with this label.</p>
<p>Given that description you can indeed ignore it, if you know what you&#8217;re doing. Anyway, in my case I have to support whatever is out there already and thus SHOULDs can not really be ignore by me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interpreting RFCs by Aristotle Pagaltzis</title>
		<link>http://pekdon.net/2010/04/21/interpreting-rfcs/comment-page-1/#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Aristotle Pagaltzis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pekdon.net/?p=174#comment-131</guid>
		<description>No, “SHOULD NOT” cannot be ignored. “SHOULD NOT” means “we cannot stop you from doing this, though we would like to, so go ahead if you think you want to, but if you do and then it breaks, you get to keep both pieces”.

And no, POST is explicitly a method you cannot pipeline.

The FAQ is simply wrong about PUT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, “SHOULD NOT” cannot be ignored. “SHOULD NOT” means “we cannot stop you from doing this, though we would like to, so go ahead if you think you want to, but if you do and then it breaks, you get to keep both pieces”.</p>
<p>And no, POST is explicitly a method you cannot pipeline.</p>
<p>The FAQ is simply wrong about PUT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on pekwm updates, bug fixes and posts by pekdon</title>
		<link>http://pekdon.net/2009/12/29/pekwm-updates-bug-fixes-and-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>pekdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 05:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pekdon.net/?p=82#comment-115</guid>
		<description>You can find the latest pekwm release here: http://pekwm.org/projects/pekwm/releases , also top hit on google for pekwm is http://www.pekwm.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can find the latest pekwm release here: <a href="http://pekwm.org/projects/pekwm/releases" rel="nofollow">http://pekwm.org/projects/pekwm/releases</a> , also top hit on google for pekwm is <a href="http://www.pekwm.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.pekwm.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Software by pekdon</title>
		<link>http://pekdon.net/software/comment-page-1/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>pekdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 05:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pekdon.net/?page_id=139#comment-114</guid>
		<description>pekwm is available on http://www.pekwm.org/ or alternatively https://projects.pekdon.net/projects/pekwm which both are sharing the same backend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pekwm is available on <a href="http://www.pekwm.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pekwm.org/</a> or alternatively <a href="https://projects.pekdon.net/projects/pekwm" rel="nofollow">https://projects.pekdon.net/projects/pekwm</a> which both are sharing the same backend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on pekwm updates, bug fixes and posts by Das</title>
		<link>http://pekdon.net/2009/12/29/pekwm-updates-bug-fixes-and-posts/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>Das</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 23:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pekdon.net/?p=82#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Sorry I did not see this section, so where is pekwm now to download?

This site looks crazy now for pekwm...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I did not see this section, so where is pekwm now to download?</p>
<p>This site looks crazy now for pekwm&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Software by Das</title>
		<link>http://pekdon.net/software/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Das</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 23:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pekdon.net/?page_id=139#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Is the pekwm website now?

I read about pekwm here, so where is it now?

THANKS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the pekwm website now?</p>
<p>I read about pekwm here, so where is it now?</p>
<p>THANKS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The best thing ever? by pekdon</title>
		<link>http://pekdon.net/2009/04/27/the-best-thing-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-73</link>
		<dc:creator>pekdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pekdon.net/?p=51#comment-73</guid>
		<description>Jag hittade den på en butik här i Oslo, är Numark så finns väl på nätbutiker lite här och var kan jag tänka mig.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jag hittade den på en butik här i Oslo, är Numark så finns väl på nätbutiker lite här och var kan jag tänka mig.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The best thing ever? by Konrad</title>
		<link>http://pekdon.net/2009/04/27/the-best-thing-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>Konrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 18:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pekdon.net/?p=51#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Najsigt värre. Vart hittar man en sån?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Najsigt värre. Vart hittar man en sån?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The best thing ever? by admin</title>
		<link>http://pekdon.net/2009/04/27/the-best-thing-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 10:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pekdon.net/?p=51#comment-59</guid>
		<description>Visst är den fantastisk!? :) Borde vara en del av alla moderna hem! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Visst är den fantastisk!? :) Borde vara en del av alla moderna hem! ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The best thing ever? by maria</title>
		<link>http://pekdon.net/2009/04/27/the-best-thing-ever/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>maria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:57:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pekdon.net/?p=51#comment-58</guid>
		<description>scheisse broder, ge till dom fattiga ;O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>scheisse broder, ge till dom fattiga ;O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
